Possession for Purpose of Trafficking Charge Withdrawn After Crown Concedes Lack of Knowledge
- Case intro
R. v. M.V. - Charges Withdrawn
The accused was charged with possession for the purpose – schedule I. The allegations involved the discovery of 5 kgs of Cocaine under the seat M.V. was sitting in. Mr. De Boyrie secured a withdrawal of the charge after lengthy negotiations with the Crown. The Crown was satisfied that, as the passenger of the vehicle, M.V. was not aware of the drugs being present.
Court: Ontario Court of Justice
Category: Drug Offences
Location: Toronto, CA
- other drug offence cases
R. v. R.M.
Drug Possession Charge Stayed After Brief Counselling Completed
The accused was charged with possession of cocaine. Mr. De Boyrie successfully negotiated a Stay of proceedings at the request of the Federal Prosecution. R.M. completed some brief counseling and did not receive a criminal record.
R. v. G.P.
All Drug Charges Stayed Due to Charter Delay Application Success
The accused was charged with several serious offences, including Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking – Schedule I. Mr. De Boyrie successfully brought an application under Section 11(b) of the Charter of Rights, as a result of significant delays in getting the matter set for trial. The charges were ultimately Stayed by the Judge.
- our process
- Results Driven
We measure success by outcomes that protect your record, your reputation, and your future. Every decision we make is focused on achieving the strongest result possible—whether that means withdrawal of charges, reduced penalties, or a full acquittal at trial. Strategic, efficient, and client-focused, we don’t settle for easy solutions when better options exist.
- Proven track record of charge withdrawals and acquittals
- Early intervention strategies that reduce long-term consequences
- Personalized legal plans tailored to each case’s strengths
- Relentless courtroom advocacy backed by thorough preparation